Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

200
Posts
116
Votes
Alan Brown
  • Rental Property Investor
  • NY MA CT VT MT, MO
116
Votes |
200
Posts

ideas on tenant pet liability insurance for pitbulls?

Alan Brown
  • Rental Property Investor
  • NY MA CT VT MT, MO
Posted

She's a pretty great tenant other than the fact that she didn't disclose she had a dog.  NOt only a dog but a Pitbull, who is on my insurance co's list of dogs they won't insure.  

She's also 6 months pregnant (the tenant) and I don't want her to move.  The dog is SUPER sweet, of course, but i cannot take a chance on something happening with the dog.  

Looking for some kind of liability insurance she can obtain that will cover us from any twists, keeping in mind that if a child got bit in the face, even accidentally by a confused dog, the lifetime cost a jury might award would be in the millions, I'm sure.

Any Ideas?

I also have not been requiring tenant insurance, more particularly pet insurance-- could that be a game changer?  My manager has been charging a $250 flat non refundable pet fee, which seems sort of useless, in fact may even make a tenant feel like they've "paid in advance for any damage, so why be astute about animal's behavior?"  Wouldn't it be better to just require them to pay for insurance to cover cat pee in carpet?  How the ins company determines whether the current pet is at fault, I don't know.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

200
Posts
116
Votes
Alan Brown
  • Rental Property Investor
  • NY MA CT VT MT, MO
116
Votes |
200
Posts
Alan Brown
  • Rental Property Investor
  • NY MA CT VT MT, MO
Replied

@Dennis M., ever been sued?    I have, 2x, by people whose lawyers  saw someone with a few buildings and figured they have lots of money.  We won both times, easily, but not without 2-3 years of waiting for the next letter from ambulance chaser lawyers, depositions, travel to the out of state property to testify, always with a niggling feeling in the back of your mind.  

Plaintiff doesn’t just go after the tenant with the dog who has nothing.  They go after everybody who has any connection with that tenant.  Me, property manager, the neighbor who opened a gate by accident.

Can’t imagine how that would be without insurance, which in each case paid over $100k in our legal fees.

I have a pit mix myself, sweetest dog in the world, but nervous around kids.  I’m lucky to have insurance for that liability... that company doesn’t do investor buildings.  

I’ve seen two different occasions where children were playing with dogs, a lab and a schnauzer, and the dogs were having fun until they got over excited and confused.  Kid puts their face too close , dog jumps and bit them in the face.  Neither more than a small scar, but both could have been disfigured:  think about how a jury comes up with a settlement:  a future life of unattainable  glory because of that split second.  Child can’t be a CEO, so parents sue because they lose $100 million a year for a 20 year career and child may end up, you guessed it, renting.  I might be glib and this seems ridiculous, but that’s exactly how it happens.

I love insurance and I’ll err on the side of caution, thank you.

Loading replies...