Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1,773
Posts
2,659
Votes
Marc Winter
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Northeast PA
2,659
Votes |
1,773
Posts

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

919
Posts
911
Votes
Alan Grobmeier
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
911
Votes |
919
Posts
Alan Grobmeier
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
Replied

@Marc Winter, as a Cali landlord I don't see this as a big deal. If I was to increase my rents by 7% PLUS inflation, I would soon be pricing myself OUT of the market. Also, note the ppl who are not effected: Less that 10 SFR, properties less than 10 years old, etc. If you have 10 SFR's, you have at least 5 Mil in property value.

I do, however, see it as a possible 'box in' for apartments & commercial.

Cali is going to vote on REPEALING part of prop 13, which IS a big deal.  The present target are those big, bad businesses that bought their property pre-1975 and were afforded low property tax.  I'm NOT sure if apartment complexes would be subject to this vote or not.  If they are, that's where the 'box-in' starts as they will pass along the property tax increase.

But it definitely proves that Cali is going after ALL the tax they can, good years or not.  The state is flush w $$$$ and probably looking to build homeless shelters that rival the Taj Mahal.

And after they are done getting those big, bad, evil businesses, they will go after the SFR. And THOSE were the ppl that were supposed to be protected. :-(

https://sf.curbed.com/2018/8/15/17693392/prop-13-c...

Loading replies...