Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 13 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

4
Posts
0
Votes
Kate C.
  • Dayton, OH
0
Votes |
4
Posts

Buying REO owner occupied duplex w/shady tenant

Kate C.
  • Dayton, OH
Posted

Hi, I wanted your opinion about this deal. We are in the process of buying a Freddy Mac foreclosure. We will occupy one side and rent the other. One side is vacant, and we met the tenant in the other half. He allowed us a showing and said he was 3 years into a verbal month to month agreement following his 1 year lease.

We would like to retain him if possible, but he has not followed thru on providing a copy of the lease or responding to requests for inspections on his side.

The selling bank has not procured a lease agreement either and our lender is getting antsy.

I have read some posts cautioning investment buyers about not seeing a lease prior to purchase. However, I wonder if I can count on evicting him and occupying "his" side if we do not come to an amicable agreement with this tenant.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,498
Posts
280
Votes
Bienes Raices
  • Orlando, FL
280
Votes |
2,498
Posts
Bienes Raices
  • Orlando, FL
Replied

Isn't this a case where you would get an "estoppel" agreement (is that the correct term?) so that the tenant can't claim that they have a 10 year lease agreement for $1/month, or something else outlandish?

Edit: If this is a foreclosure, why is there a tenant still there? I have never seen that.

Loading replies...