Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 13 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1,316
Posts
569
Votes
Nathan Emmert
  • Investor
  • San Ramon, CA
569
Votes |
1,316
Posts

Expense Rule of Thumb for Single Family Houses?

Nathan Emmert
  • Investor
  • San Ramon, CA
Posted

I understand the tried and true 50% rule (or guideline) for rentals but that is based on apartments, i.e. multifamily dwellings.

What's the rule for single family houses?

I would assume it would be lower as expenses often paid for by a landlord on MFH such as landscape upkeep, sidewalks, water/sewer/garbage, etc are transferred directly to the renter in a single family dwelling??

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

17,995
Posts
17,198
Votes
J Scott
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
17,198
Votes |
17,995
Posts
J Scott
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
ModeratorReplied

It's probably about the same. While there are some costs that are offset for a SFH (like the ones you mention above), you also generally lose out on the economies of scale.

For example, with an apartment building, your PM costs (percentage) will generally be less than a single house, your maintenance costs will generally be less than a single house, your vacancy could very well be less (since with a single family house, you potentially lose tenants during a turnover, whereas with an apartment, you have other places to put them), etc.

So, I would guess that it's still in the 45-55% range, depending on the condition, age, location, etc of the property.

That said, I have no hard data to support this assumption...

Loading replies...