Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

39
Posts
8
Votes
Sebastien Beauboeuf
  • Chicago, IL
8
Votes |
39
Posts

How do you deal with pushback from increasing the rent?

Sebastien Beauboeuf
  • Chicago, IL
Posted

I've been looking at some small multi family homes on the MLS in Chicago and it seems like a lot of the rents on there are below market. I assume that the rents are placed by the seller's agent and are accurate. So I asked myself why are the rent low? Below are what I came up with.

1- the seller fully owns the property and doesn't really care about increasing rents

2- the seller doesn't keep up with the market and don't know he/she can increase rent

3- the seller is worried increasing rent might drive the tenants away

I figure investors like to see the low rent and have plans to increase it once they acquire the property. I always wondered how hard it was to do that? Let's say the tenants have lived there for years and always paid on time and kept the place in good condition. How does an investor come in and tell them they'll have to pay $200+ and risk loosing them and having the property(ies) vacant. How do they make that decision?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

13,926
Posts
12,725
Votes
Replied

Assuming you are aware of market rents, and the reason you invested was to make money you send notice to increase to full market. When you take ownership the best approach is to push to full market immediately to maximise profits long term. If the tennat can not afford full market rent you do not want them as tenants. Some investors choose to raise rents gradually in an attempt to avoid a vacancy. The problem with this approach is that if they can not afford market rents they will eventually move out. The investor will not only have lost rental income but suffered the vacancy as well. Their poor business approach actually increases their losses over raising rent to full market immediately. If tenants can not afford full market rents you do not want them. Find out immediately upon taking ownership.
As for how to do it, send a notice of rent increase. Landlords that operate their business through avoidance due to fear of vacancies usually lose more money and retain low quality tenants. All tenants leave eventually sooner is better than later when rents are below market.

Loading replies...