Skip to content
Two investors reviewing resources on a laptop

Get industry-leading resources — for free

Unlock resources for every investing strategy and stage with a free account.

By continuing, you agree to BiggerPockets LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

1,638
Posts
1,061
Votes
Cal C.
  • Investor
  • Peachtree Corners, GA
1,061
Votes |
1,638
Posts

Surprisingly Simple Math to Early RE Retirement (Napkin Math)

Cal C.
  • Investor
  • Peachtree Corners, GA
Posted

I posted this in the member blogs last week, but wanted to get some more eyeballs on it.

As many of you know, Mister Money Mustache (MMM) wrote a blog post entitled The Shockingly Simple Math Behind Early Retirement that if nothing else gives stock investors a very simple rough estimate to how much money they will need to retire. It translates to basically 25 times expected annual spending. We can argue the issues with that article but whatever flaws it does or does not have it at least gives investors some idea as to their savings target.

There is also a surprisingly simple way to figure out how much real estate (or really, how many single family residences) you need to retire. Assumptions here are that you have paid off the real estate involved, your net operating income (rent-expenses except for mortgage-NOI) is at 50% of rent and rent will keep roughly in line with inflation.

To keep this even more simple we'll use a nice round rent amount, $1,000. Using the 50% rule of thumb, you can quickly see the NOI is $500. 12*$500=$6,000. So simply using that number as a building block quickly gives you a rough estimate of how many paid off single family residences you need to retire providing you know how much you're expected spending is going to be. For example, if your expected spending is $60,000 annually then you need ten mortgage free houses.

However, one of the flaws of the MMM article and the math laid out in the previous paragraph is the disregard for taxes. Taxes are a very important consideration with real estate because of the tax advantages of depreciation. In fact, your taxes may be cut nearly in half because of it. Here is an example: the basis on your rental property is $100,000. You set aside 20% for land value leaving you $80,000 to depreciate over 27.5 years. That gives you $2,909 in depreciation per property. If you have ten similar rental houses then that would effectively reduce your taxable income by $29,090. Assuming that you are paying 20% in combined state and federal income tax then that reduces your tax bill by more than $5,800.

Here is the back of the napkin math.

Rent/50%=ROI

(House cost-land)/27.5=Depreciation

NOI-Depreciation=Taxable Income per house

NOI-(taxable income*tax rate)=After tax income per house

Expected spending/After tax income per house=number of houses needed to retire

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

28,242
Posts
41,507
Votes
Nathan Gesner
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Cody, WY
41,507
Votes |
28,242
Posts
Nathan Gesner
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Cody, WY
ModeratorReplied

Yes, this is a good point. It's not uncommon for napkin math to leave some things out which is why it's simple and can be done on a napkin. I would hope people are a little more thorough in planning their future.

  • Nathan Gesner
business profile image
The DIY Landlord Book
4.7 stars
246 Reviews

Loading replies...