Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 6 years ago,

User Stats

236
Posts
392
Votes
Keith A.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Texas
392
Votes |
236
Posts

Need advice - SFH with 3 roommate applicants.

Keith A.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Texas
Posted

Hi All,

SFH being shown by an agent. 3 chick friends are applying together. I haven't been in this situation before. I of course would background check all 3 and all 3 have to meet that criteria, but when I have a minimum income requirement that the applicant make 3 times the monthly rent. This isn't a parent w/ children or married couple plus one. It's 3 separate people. So my gut instinct is that all 3 must separately meet the income requirement. What would you do? Would you do one or 3 leases? Or would you even entertain 3 non-related people in a 3 bedroom house?

Loading replies...