Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

17
Posts
7
Votes
Joseph Kotey
7
Votes |
17
Posts

14 Unit in Brooklyn with Family or Go alone in New England?

Joseph Kotey
Posted

A little long but interesting: I own a part of a 14 unit that is RENT STABILIZED in Brooklyn NY with 7 Family members which has been in the family for decades.  The rents are very low and only 25%-50% of market rates due to the very strict rent stabilization laws. Therefore the property value is that much less due to low rents and strict laws keeping them low.  Even though it's paid off, it's barely enough income for 2 people  and certainly not 7. The only way that we can make money that I know of  is by going through the intense process of converting units to condos.

The problem is that half of the family wants to keep it unprofitable as is for at least 5 years due to a random, confusing request by our deceased Grandmother. They are also already well of financially and not interested in business in general. Some are even ant-business and anti landlord. They feel bad about trying to get rid of tenants etc. My side of the family wants to realize the profits one way or the other so we are thinking of selling or taking a buy out.

I think a full or at least a partial buyout is best as we will not be able to work well together due to different business philosophies  . I run a small delivery service and have 2 rental properties. I would like to increase my income asap and would like to do it through rental income or something similar. 

So feel free to give your feedback on the family property but almost more importantly I would like to know the best way to turn 100k into 3k-5k a month rental income or the like. I'm in Providence RI. Multi families are 200k-500k depending on the area. Thanks!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,456
Posts
1,400
Votes
Anthony Thompson
  • Buy and Hold Investor
  • Cranston, RI
1,400
Votes |
1,456
Posts
Anthony Thompson
  • Buy and Hold Investor
  • Cranston, RI
Replied

@Joseph Kotey it's not exactly clear what you're asking specifically. On a quick read, it sounds like half your family wants to run the property like a charity, and the other half (yours) does not.

If were in your position, I would either want to buy the other side out, or get bought out. It sounds like staying in the current situation is just holding you back from starting your own real estate business where you can follow your own business sense wherever it takes you.

Regarding your bigger question of increasing your income asap, to be honest I don't think your numbers are realistic. It's certainly possible to get a 3K/month return on a 100K investment but I would have to say that is by far a rarity and would be an exceptionally good and uncommon (and possibly risky) deal - you're talking about a 36% return.

I would never say never, but I think it's very unrealistic to expect that kind of return early on in your investing career. With leverage you might be able to make half that (1500/mo or 18% cash on cash return) if you're very, very lucky. But I think a 10-15% cash on cash return would be more realistic.

Also keep in mind that with leverage you'll be increasing your return, but also increasing your risk because those mortgage payments are a fixed expense that must be paid no matter what else is going on with the property or your life. (The government and the bank get paid first, and if they don't, they take the property from you.)

I'm in the middle of doing exactly the kind of deal you're talking about, bringing 100 to the table and buying a property for 280. My cash on cash return is estimated to be only 6% but you know what? I'm happy to get it because 1) price-wise it's actually one of the better deals I've seen in today's overpriced market, 2) my risk is much lower because my LTV is only 65% (i.e. lower leverage) which I feel very good about in this phase of the market, and 3) my alternative was to pay a bunch of taxes, so effectively a good part of that return is made on money I would have otherwise had to pay to the government.

My point isn't to dampen your enthusiasm but to maybe recommend that you talk to some other investors (in NY or Rhode Island!) and see what they say about realistic expectations of return for capital invested and risks taken.

Or to put it even more simply, as much as you might want to, it might not be time to quit the delivery service just yet :)

  • Anthony Thompson
  • Loading replies...