Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 13 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

8
Posts
1
Votes
Sinco Pare
  • Residential Real Estate Agent
  • St. Paul, MN
1
Votes |
8
Posts

Tenant & City in Cahoots vs. Landlord

Sinco Pare
  • Residential Real Estate Agent
  • St. Paul, MN
Posted

Laughing to keep from crying...here's a new way for the tenant and city to be in cahoots...somehow disable the automated electronic water meter!

Tenant dutifully pays off their final water bill. A month later, I sell the property and go down to city hall with the final meter reading. They tell me the electronic water meter was broken, and that my final bill was $150 for a month when noone was living there. Turns out they were estimating the tenant usage, and they never had a real reading until I showed up. Of course, noone ever told me the electronic meter was broke!

Ahhhh...another way for the landlord to hold the bag in the end. :oops:

Loading replies...