Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 14 years ago,

User Stats

5
Posts
0
Votes
Mark S.
  • Investor
  • Bakersfield, CA
0
Votes |
5
Posts

Bought Property with Existing Tenant am I responsible for deposit?

Mark S.
  • Investor
  • Bakersfield, CA
Posted

I recently purchased a property that was a short sale, and the purchase addendum stated two things: 1. that I allow existing tenants to remain in the property upon review of the existing lease, and 2. that the tenant's deposit and prorated rents would not be transfered. Now I am being told that this is the same as me assuming their lease and deposit? I don't believe so, but I would appreciate some feedback. Maybe I was just duped by the seller and I don't know it.

Loading replies...