Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 6 years ago,

User Stats

84
Posts
10
Votes
Erick Caffarello
  • Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
10
Votes |
84
Posts

Sure Deposit: Good? Bad?

Erick Caffarello
  • Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
Posted

Hi folks!

The complex I used to work at had previously used Sure Deposit before moving away from it (for an undisclosed reason).

Has anyone here had experience with Sure Deposit?  It sounds like a great program.  Instead of a tenant paying a $1200 security deposit at move in, they pay a smaller "bond" which covers me in the event they default or are evicted and covers up to a certain threshold for damages.

I've done some research on google, and some people love it, some people hate it.  What could someone hate about it?  If a tenant defaults, rather than chase them down, you file a claim and supposedly the insurance company (Assurant) sends you a check for the damages and then pursues the former tenant for collection.


I only own four properties, so from what I read, some people have said you have to own several units in order for it to work for you, while others say it works for them.

Of course, when you talk to Assurant, they sing the praises of the program...why would they say any different?

Recently, I was lucky, very lucky!  The tenant skipped, but has a good job and her wages have been garnished ever since.  It usually never happens this way.  I want to make sure I do everything in my power to reduce property damage/delinquency.  

Your feedback would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks much.

Erick

Loading replies...