Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 7 years ago, 01/05/2018

User Stats

519
Posts
221
Votes
Brian H.
  • Carolina
221
Votes |
519
Posts

Question about valuing a Triplex.

Brian H.
  • Carolina
Posted

Hello All,

I am currently looking into the possibility of grabbing a triplex.  

In the area where I am looking, the average non-commericial property prices are about 115% - 125% of the tax value.  This property is from the 1950's.  It is in OK condition.  It will need some updating and minor rehab but is technically ready to go. It has three one bedroom units and has tennants in each that have been there for about 3 years each.  The listing price for this property is about 245% over tax value.  Granted, the property is valued (with land) at about $54,500.  The listing price is about $130,000.  Obviously, not a high price tag, but I am still confused by that substantial jump.  It is in an OK area. Probably a grade B, B- area.  Not bad, but not great.  Bringing in about $1450/month in rent, total for all units combined and a little under market rent.  The current owner pays utilities but I don't think I would want to do that.  

Anyways, the base numbers are attractive, but my main question lies in the valuing.  I feel like, based on the area, it is very overpriced, and I am sure they are accounting for it being an income-producing property in that price, but isn't that only something you do with commercial (5+ units) properties?  

Thanks for any advice!

Loading replies...