Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 14 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

10
Posts
9
Votes
Ryan Johnson
9
Votes |
10
Posts

Rentals why no cats?

Ryan Johnson
Posted

My wife and I are cross-shopping rentals and buying. Leaning more towards renting though. My question is this... We are very meticulous people. We have the nicest looking home on our street, greenest grass, tidiest yard. The inside of our place is pristine. My wife on the other hand loves her cats. In all seriousness our cats have never ripped, torn or damaged anything in our home. They like 99% of household cats use a litter box and have never had an accident outside of their litter box. They don't stink or smell and we've tested this with friends that don't like cats and are sensitive to smells.

Unfortunately we are walking away from our beautiful home because it is severely underwater. We would expect to keep a rental in the same pristine condition as our current home and wish to take a long term lease out 3-4 years.

The funny thing is we are having a hard time finding a "nice" place to rent that will allow us to bring our two cats. What gives....???? Honestly one toddler does more damage to a home than two cats. Why are renters so reluctant to rent to cats owners?

We found a nice home that we would love to rent today but the owner said they have turned numerous potential renters away because of their pets. They are holding out for someone with no pets. Seems like there are fewer people out there without pets.

We were even willing to let the owners see how we presently keep our current home as proof we would insist on maintaining their property in similar fashion but they were still strict.

I understand why someone would not want to rent to dog owners. Dogs eat wood fencing, the stucco siding on homes, chew up drip lines, dig holes, kill grass when they pee in the yard. Have accidents on rugs and carpeting. But Cats??? Cats are often more meticulous than humans.

Just venting but if anyone can help me figure out why landlords are so picky about cats maybe it will help me.

Thanks in advance.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,821
Posts
446
Votes
Richard Warren
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Las Vegas, NV
446
Votes |
1,821
Posts
Richard Warren
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Las Vegas, NV
Replied
Originally posted by Ryan Johnson:

to deny someone because they are going through a foreclosure is absurd, and largely unethical.
Sheesh.... what does a foreclosure have anything to do with someone renting from you.


Absurd? Ridiculous? Unethical? Far from it. If you are being foreclosed you have bad credit and bad credit is a perfectly valid reason to deny a prospective tenant. I not saying you should be, but it is a legally valid reason.

You indicate that you are walking away from your home because it is underwater. Does that mean there is no hardship? If you are walking away just because it is worth less than the amount you willingly paid for the home, times are indeed changing. I’m amazed at how much attitudes have changed and that it has become perfectly acceptable to walk away because you people don’t feel like paying anymore because the home lost value. Would those same people have given the bank more money because the house went up?

Again, you may have a legitimate reason for losing your home but it is not unethical to deny someone because of bad credit.

:cool:

Loading replies...