Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 7 years ago, 10/25/2017

User Stats

133
Posts
35
Votes
Chad C.
  • Denham Springs, LA
35
Votes |
133
Posts

Tenant responsible for damage due to negligence

Chad C.
  • Denham Springs, LA
Posted
I have a tenant that has had some water damage due to a leaky roof, and at this point the damage is quite extensive. The tenant has been in there for eight months, and I have owned the unit for six months. They said that the drywall was saturated and crumbling in an 8x12 area, and the repair man said the leak has been going on for a while, possibly before they even moved in, but I didn't notice it when I bought it. I'm going to replace the roof, which is my responsibility. But the question is the extensive damage that's done to the inside, that 8 x 12 area needs new drywall, studs, and rafter sill plate. The lease states that they are responsible for this, but strategy wise, I think I would just push the tenants away. They would leave, I would never be able to get the money, and I would be without rent for a few months. These are very low income tenants. I should be able to keep their security deposits. Do y'all have any examples where y'all made tenants pay for damages, and it was for the best, or worst?

User Stats

991
Posts
781
Votes
Christine Kankowski
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Temecula, CA
781
Votes |
991
Posts
Christine Kankowski
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Temecula, CA
Replied

DId they report it when they noticed it?  Obviously it is possible they didn't see it right away since you didn't notice it when you purchased the home.

In my opinion, they didn't cause the roof leak so they should not be liable.  If they didn't report it and the damage became worse, i guess they could be responsible for that, but you would have to prove that they knew about it for a while before reporting. May not be worth the trouble, since they are super low income anyway and you probably wont get the money. 

User Stats

168
Posts
126
Votes
John A.
  • Investor
  • Sierra Vista, AZ
126
Votes |
168
Posts
John A.
  • Investor
  • Sierra Vista, AZ
Replied

Did you have the home inspected when you bought it?  It the leak was present when you bought it, I would not hold the tenants responsible for damage caused by the leak.

BiggerPockets logo
Join Our Private Community for Passive Investors
|
BiggerPockets
Get first-hand insights and real sponsor reviews from other investors

User Stats

8,351
Posts
4,355
Votes
Colleen F.
Pro Member
  • Investor
  • Narragansett, RI
4,355
Votes |
8,351
Posts
Colleen F.
Pro Member
  • Investor
  • Narragansett, RI
Replied
I would say its your house, your roof you are respondsible. You also didnt notice it in 8 months. This kind of water damage is not easily noticed in the beginning and there is no telling how the damage progressed. Now if it was a faucet leaking and they just let it go forever or they overflow the appliance that might have been an issue I would hold them accountable for

User Stats

753
Posts
565
Votes
Amy Beth
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Edison, NJ
565
Votes |
753
Posts
Amy Beth
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Edison, NJ
Replied

I do not understand why you are blaming the tenants for a leaky roof. Unless the tenants got on the roof and damaged it, which I highly doubt, it seems to me that a roof is the landlord’s responsibility. I would suggest getting it fixed ASAP.

User Stats

5,116
Posts
5,168
Votes
Kyle J.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Northern, CA
5,168
Votes |
5,116
Posts
Kyle J.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Northern, CA
Replied

I agree with the others.  This is your responsibility as the landlord to fix, not the tenants.  For what it's worth, I had a similar issue where a slow roof leak allowed water to accumulate in the attic and - when the saturated insulation got heavy enough - a section of the ceiling caved in.  Aside from the cost of the new roof I had to put on, the ceiling repair was fairly inexpensive.  Mostly labor and I did that part of the repair.  Here's a couple before and after pics:

User Stats

27,503
Posts
40,455
Votes
Nathan Gesner
Property Manager
Agent
Pro Member
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Cody, WY
40,455
Votes |
27,503
Posts
Nathan Gesner
Property Manager
Agent
Pro Member
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Cody, WY
ModeratorReplied

I find it interesting that you didn't find any evidence of a leak when you bought the place. Did you have a home inspection? There should have been evidence of the leak in the attic space.

Unless you can prove the tenants saw the damage taking place and failed to report it, I don't think you have a case.

  • Nathan Gesner
business profile image
The DIY Landlord
4.7 stars
153 Reviews