Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago,

User Stats

1,225
Posts
561
Votes
Scott Weaner
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Yardley, PA
561
Votes |
1,225
Posts

Interesting Legal Dilemma

Scott Weaner
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Yardley, PA
Posted

I have an interesting legal dilemma. I own an unusual property in Mount Laurel. It is a townhome-type property that consists of 1/2 of the 2nd floor and the 3rd floor of a 3 story building. The lower unit has the 1st and 1/2 of the second. it has a shared driveway. The backyard is strictly owned/used by the 1st-floor owner who is an absentee landlord. That unit is unoccupied. I have already done roof and driveway repairs at my expense.

The neighbors are complaining that a retaining wall in the backyard is collapsing. This retaining wall is there due to a change in elevation between the 2 connected properties. My feeling is that this would be the responsibility of the owner of the lower unit. Of course, I could be totally wrong...nothing new there!

Any thoughts?

Loading replies...