Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago,

User Stats

378
Posts
247
Votes
Christen G.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Seattle, WA
247
Votes |
378
Posts

Triplex - inheriting tenants who haven't been paying utilities?

Christen G.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Seattle, WA
Posted

Morning everyone! 

My partner and I were just accepted on a triplex in Tacoma, Wa pending walk-through and inspection. We did the walk through yesterday and it's in decent shape - hooray!  Here comes the but: The place is only metered with 1 meter though and in Tacoma (unlike any place where I've ever rented) the owner is responsible for paying (and having in their name) the utilities (W/S/G + gas). The tenants put electric in their name. 

We are inheriting tenants (fun!) Some more facts:

- Their current rents are slightly below market

- They are all currently Month-to-Month tenants

- Adding separate meters would be about $4-5k/piece - not in the plan for us at the moment.


Our plan is to issue the tenants 3 choices and give them a month to decide which they'd like to do:

1) sign a 12-mo lease with a modest/small rent increase + an additional $150/mo for utilities

2) continue on a MTM lease with a higher MTM fee + an additional $150/mo for utilities

3) move out

Obviously we'd like them to go to options 1 or 3 as keeping them on MTM increases our chances of vacancies and it is traditionally harder to rent in the winter months. Option 3 allows us to go in and do some light cosmetic repairs, shine them up a bit and get it back on the market for higher rents.

When we run the numbers as is everything looks great until we factor in eating the cost of those utilities - which in Tacoma is not cheap. We're still cash positive, but it's barely $100. When we run the numbers with the hypothetical increased rents + utility payments we walk with ~$800/mo. Hooray!  This budget includes $200/mo towards CapX (roof will eventually need to be done) and a healthy $250/mo towards repairs/landscaping and anything else that comes up right away.

So I guess my questions are: does this sound reasonable to everyone? Has anyone ever done this "flat rate towards utilities" to tenants and how do they react? Mostly it feels like it's about about optics - and Option 1 (with the small rent increase + a small utility fee is easier to swallow than here's a $400 rent increase.


I find it nuts that the last owner was eating all of those utility costs - but as I've learned everyone's finances are different and maybe he owned the house/didn't have a mortgage. Thanks for your thoughts and comments. Bonus points for you if you have any hot tips on inheriting tenants - the last time we did that it didn't go so well.

Thank you.

Loading replies...