Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago,

User Stats

30
Posts
13
Votes
Jacqua Le Fleur
  • Los Angeles, CA
13
Votes |
30
Posts

Minimum Occupancy Enforcement - HELP

Jacqua Le Fleur
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

Greetings all. Quick question. I want to make sure that I am correct in upholding my occupancy limitation of 2 people for my 1 bedroom rental property. I read the Fair Housing Memo which outlined their interpretation of the minimum occupancy to be 2 persons per bedroom.  I've reached out to Building and Safety Dept. in Los Angeles with no luck in getting a clear answer. Can anyone help clarify this. Can I legally reject an applicant for my 1 bedroom rental if they are a single parent with 2 kids ( equals 3 total people)? What about if its 2 adults and a 5 year old? Is that 3 people? What is the age threshold that constitutes an additional "person?" What are my options? Thank you all in advance.  

Loading replies...