Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

113
Posts
41
Votes
Eric C.
  • Laguna Niguel, CA
41
Votes |
113
Posts

Fair Tenant Placement Pricing Structure

Eric C.
  • Laguna Niguel, CA
Posted

Standard structure is a % of 1st months rent for a PM to place a new tenant.  Included in this fee would be any agent commission if the tenant was represented by an agent.  If tenant finds property through many of the online websites, no commission is paid and PM company keeps full amount (ie. double-dipping).  Since the agent commission is a high percentage of this amount, how can a landlord ensure that the PM company is unbiased during the tenant search phase. 

Are any PM companies using a more "fair" compensation structure that would prevent bias during the tenant search phase?  The only structure I can think of is instead of using a fixed % of 1st months rent, use a fixed fee + agent commission (if applicable) structure.  Any thoughts?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

28,053
Posts
41,043
Votes
Nathan Gesner
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Cody, WY
41,043
Votes |
28,053
Posts
Nathan Gesner
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Cody, WY
ModeratorReplied

The most common method is for the PM to charge 50 - 100% of a month's rent as the leasing fee. They share a portion of that fee with any outside agent that brings a qualified renter.

EXAMPLE: Your home rents for $1,000 a month with a leasing fee of 50%. An outside agent brings a qualified tenant and they move in. Your Property Manager charges $500 for the leasing fee and pays $200 of that to the other agent.

If they find the tenant through their internal processes, they still charge the full leasing fee. Why would this be unacceptable? Either they are paying the other agent or they are paying for their internal marketing. The cost to you is the same.

I have seen some Property Managers charge a reduced fee if the unit sits vacant longer than XX days. I've also seen them waive management fees on a vacant property to show good faith that they are only paid when you are paid, which is what I do. On the other hand, some managers charge a fee on vacant homes because they want compensation for the time spent checking on it, reporting to you, etc.

You have to shop around and determine what is normal for the market and what you are willing to accept. There are cheaper managers out there but what services do they provide? Sometimes the most expensive manager is the one that puts more money in your pocket at the end of the day.

  • Nathan Gesner
business profile image
The DIY Landlord Book
4.7 stars
165 Reviews

Loading replies...