Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago,

User Stats

2
Posts
0
Votes
Ben Welch
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Erie, CO
0
Votes |
2
Posts

Advice on collecting rent from previous owner

Ben Welch
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Erie, CO
Posted

Hey BP! I’m looking for some advice on a recent buy and hold purchase in Memphis. On March 3rd, I closed on 8 units (4 duplexes next to each other) after a long negotiation process. Our first offer contained a special stipulation that read “Rent to be pro-rated at closing” even though the contract also has a prorations clause. When the seller countered our offer they left that special stipulation out. I didn’t think much of it because we still had the prorations clause in the contract. The closing agent then told us that we would need to collect March rents after closing and that she would not be prorating any rents. I should have pushed back on this but didn’t unfortunately – lesson learned.

Rent for March is about $3,100 and the seller had already collected by the time we closed. The seller’s argument is that since the special stipulation was added then removed, that means the standard prorations clause no longer applies. I don’t agree with that logic. I am considering taking the seller to small claims court but am out of state so it would not be very easy.

Has anybody dealt with this before or have any thoughts on whether my interpretation of the contract is correct?

Loading replies...