Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago,

User Stats

63
Posts
55
Votes
Brent Tarnow
Pro Member
  • Investor
  • Oakland, CA
55
Votes |
63
Posts

1 high credit, qualified tenant; 1 bad credit, unqualified tenant

Brent Tarnow
Pro Member
  • Investor
  • Oakland, CA
Posted

New landlord in Oakland, CA looking for some advice. 

We are trying to rent a unit and we have interest from a couple in which the woman has a 790 credit score, makes good money and by all accounts would be an ideal tenant.  The man has a much lower credit score with a couple of very old (but small) collections on his report.  He will also not have a job in the short-term.  

Here's my question:  Is it better to just have the tenant with good credit and finances sign the lease, or is it still better to have both of them on it?  Does it make any difference if, say, she were to leave and he decided not to vacate?  

I'm inclined to have her just sign the lease, but if he holds over does it make it harder for us, as the landlords, to assert our rights against a squatter with no lease whatsoever?  

Thanks

  • Brent Tarnow
  • Loading replies...