Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

125
Posts
7
Votes
Jeremy Lee
  • Laguna Niguel, CA
7
Votes |
125
Posts

Duplex/Triplex/Quadplex/etc sizing for rentals

Jeremy Lee
  • Laguna Niguel, CA
Posted

Hey all,

Was curious if there's a general 'rule of thumb' when looking for a duplex/multiplex in terms of # of bed/baths and what would be the best setup for renting out either all or a portion of it (if I were to live in it). In my area (LA/OC) I've been seeing quite a few properties where the first unit might be 2/1 or 3/2 and the remaining units are 1/1. Are the 1/1 units pretty desirable to live in or at least pretty easy to keep occupied? For some reason, I have it in my mind that 3/2s are the most desirable (probably because of reading John Schaub's book) but of course that's in the context of SFHs. It just seems like the turnover and vacancy rates for 1/1s would be higher in general.

Loading replies...