Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago,

User Stats

7
Posts
2
Votes
Jeremy Chaser
  • Minneapolis, MN
2
Votes |
7
Posts

Are very small, very cheap single family homes good rentals?

Jeremy Chaser
  • Minneapolis, MN
Posted

I'm itching to jump into my first real estate investment for rental property. One type of property that strikes me as a little unusual is something like:

~800-1100 sq ft

2-3 BR, 1-2 bath

Small lot, maybe a detached garage but usually not

Price of <$60,000

I'm looking in a city where the average home is about ~160k and I see a lot of these very small, apartment-like homes for sale in the 50-60k region. These seem like a gold mind to me in terms of cash flow, but I see several of them in seemingly good condition languishing on the market for months when more traditional homes in the city are under contract within days.

For example, here's one such house I'm looking at that is very common around here:

Asking price: $52,000

908 sq ft, 2 BR, 1 bath

No garage, small lot, siding/roof are <3 years old and mechanicals are <6 years old. 

I toured the house and it was shockingly clean. There were a few drab areas where it could use some new paint, but nothing too wild. It has been on the market for 3 months with price drops from 70k down to current price. I spoke with the realtor and he said it's just a difficult house to sell due to the size, which to me seems ideal for a rental. I also have pretty extensive experience in home construction and spent a solid hour touring the house and couldn't really find anything significantly wrong, like a crumbling foundation or major wood rot.

When I look at comparable rentals in the area, it's not uncommon to get $800-1,000/mo + utilities for a similar 2 BR/1 BA apartment. At this price, the mortgage and insurance would be <$300/mo (if I didn't just buy it cash), leaving $500+/mo minus vacancy, maintenance/repairs, etc. to come out ahead. For such a small investment, these seem so ideal.

And yet I see 8 of these types of homes on the market right now varying between 15 days and 6 months on the market, which is super unusual around here. Despite my desire to think I'm the only one smart enough to spot such a deal, I think that's unlikely. Why are people passing on these houses for investment purposes?

Loading replies...