Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

264
Posts
70
Votes
Christine Swaidan
  • Investor
  • Ventura, CA
70
Votes |
264
Posts

OTR Microwave damage

Christine Swaidan
  • Investor
  • Ventura, CA
Posted

Tenants just vacated property. The two year old over the range microwave has damage to the inside of the door--a dime-size indent. While it does not go all the way through it is obvious damage and I will not want the next tenants using what could be an unsafe microwave. Is a microwave something that should be prorated like you would a carpet? I'm wondering how much of the replacement cost I charge to vacating tenants.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

13,926
Posts
12,725
Votes
Replied

If the damage does not go through buy a home test unit and see if it is emitting any harmful rays. If it does not then you can not hold the tenants responsible for any prorated costs. You would be deciding unnecessarily to replace something that does not require replacement and they should not be held responsible. You can not simply charge a tenant because you "think" there is damage. "could be unsafe" does not qualify.

If on the other hand it does test to be leaking go ahead and charge them.

Loading replies...