Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

264
Posts
70
Votes
Christine Swaidan
  • Investor
  • Ventura, CA
70
Votes |
264
Posts

OTR Microwave damage

Christine Swaidan
  • Investor
  • Ventura, CA
Posted

Tenants just vacated property. The two year old over the range microwave has damage to the inside of the door--a dime-size indent. While it does not go all the way through it is obvious damage and I will not want the next tenants using what could be an unsafe microwave. Is a microwave something that should be prorated like you would a carpet? I'm wondering how much of the replacement cost I charge to vacating tenants.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

13,926
Posts
12,727
Votes
Replied

If the damage does not go through buy a home test unit and see if it is emitting any harmful rays. If it does not then you can not hold the tenants responsible for any prorated costs. You would be deciding unnecessarily to replace something that does not require replacement and they should not be held responsible. You can not simply charge a tenant because you "think" there is damage. "could be unsafe" does not qualify.

If on the other hand it does test to be leaking go ahead and charge them.

Loading replies...