Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

50
Posts
24
Votes
Mike Austin
  • Investor
  • Round Rock, TX
24
Votes |
50
Posts

Inheriting long lease on lower rent

Mike Austin
  • Investor
  • Round Rock, TX
Posted

I just had my first ever offer accepted for a duplex that I planned to owner-occupy. I got a discount on the price because the property has been neglected and needs some rehab work. 

The property was listed on mls as having an active lease that ended on 07/2017 which I foolishly believed but when I received the actual lease which shows the tenant renewed until 07/2018. I'd have to inherit this tenant for 1.5yrs instead of the 7 months I was expecting. Their rent is 275$ under market and completely throws my numbers which I based on raising to market rent after rehab when the lease expired.

Assuming they're reliably paying rent, would it make sense to go ahead with my purchase, and keep them for the additional year? I'd lose a projected ~3300$ in rent increases but I would keep their side as-is without rehab and just work my occupied side & exterior. Am I missing something with this path?

Any thoughts would be appreciated since this is my first pass at this and I don't have any experience or much help through the purchase process.

Thanks BP!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,613
Posts
2,104
Votes
Kim Meredith Hampton
  • Real Estate Broker
  • St Petersburg
2,104
Votes |
2,613
Posts
Kim Meredith Hampton
  • Real Estate Broker
  • St Petersburg
Replied

Assuming it's in a good area and you are going to like where you live, I would go ahead and purchase the duplex.

It will take you a while to rehab your side because you will be living their. No expense on the other side until they vacate

business profile image
Engel & Völkers | St. Pete
5.0 stars
14 Reviews

Loading replies...