Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

35
Posts
7
Votes
John S.
  • Rosemead, CA
7
Votes |
35
Posts

Purchasing with no tenants or inherit tenants

John S.
  • Rosemead, CA
Posted

When I first got started investing in 1-4 units, I always thought having tenants when you purchase a 1-4 unit is a better deal than it being vacant:

1) It could mean that something could be wrong with the property preventing it from being rented.
2) There is a security with a tenant in place that even an inspection won't fix.  For example, people don't want to steal an AC unit when they know someone is living there.
3) You know you will have income coming in from the beginning.  I have heard this is good from getting a mortgage and it most likely is the reason I have been able to get mortgages easily on a couple of mine.

In an opposite view, my property manager really doesn't like inheriting tenants.  He knows he has to follow the contract that is already in place and he has to build trust with a tenant that he might not have chosen if he had the choice during a tenant screening.  Nevertheless, he is incentivized to take this tenant and turn him over since he can make a bigger profit from the management and tenant placement fees involved.

I wanted to see what other peoples' opinion are in this subject.  If you inherit a tenant and they don't work out, that means you will have to pay for turnover cost and most likely you will have to look at eviction when you take over the unit.  I think we a trustworthy PM than it might be better to have a vacant unit.


Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,836
Posts
2,065
Votes
Jeff Copeland
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Tampa Bay/St Petersburg, FL
2,065
Votes |
1,836
Posts
Jeff Copeland
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Tampa Bay/St Petersburg, FL
Replied

As a property manager, I much prefer screening and placing tenants to inheriting tenants. 

Inheriting tenants is like a box of chocolates; You just never know what you're going to get!

In my experience (and this is admittedly probably more of a concern for multi-family properties), sellers have an incentive to relax their tenant screening requirements in order to get the property to "full occupancy" so they can advertise a higher cap rate. But these lower-quality tenants don't tend to pay on time (or at all) or stay long...so as a buyer, you run the risk of paying for an eviction, plus a month or two of no rent + vacancy. 

This is not all tenants of course - in my experience, about 50% my inherited tenants didn't work out. 

But if half of the tenants I screened and placed as a property manager washed out, I wouldn't be a property manager for very long!

  • Jeff Copeland

Loading replies...