Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

14
Posts
7
Votes
Kevin C.
  • Investor
  • Springdale, AR
7
Votes |
14
Posts

Tenants getting divorced. Contacted by husband about lease

Kevin C.
  • Investor
  • Springdale, AR
Posted

Short and sweet: These tenants were approved for our rental based on the husband's income. The wife did not work at the time, possibly still doesn't. I was contacted by the husband today asking me if it would be possible to remove him from the lease and leave his wife on it. Unless she now has a job, I don't see how she could possibly pay for our house. We are going to the property on Monday for an inspection so we can talk to the wife then, but what should we do in this situation? If she has the income, do we terminate the old lease and write a new one? This would give us a chance to bump the rent $100  or more. Or do we force him to stay on it because he did sign it, after all? 

Loading replies...