Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

206
Posts
156
Votes
Ana Marie B.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • SF Bay Area, CA
156
Votes |
206
Posts

Interesting Anti-Landlord Ordinance Approved in Seattle

Ana Marie B.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • SF Bay Area, CA
Posted

Curious what others think of this new pro-renter ordinance approved in Seattle.  Would this make you think twice before investing in Seattle RE?

In a nutshell, this ordinance aims to ban "discrimination by landlords against renters with alternative sources of income, such as Social Security benefits, veteran’s benefits, unemployment insurance, child-support payments and other assistance programs. The ordinance also will require landlords to review applications one at a time, then pick the first renter who meets their screening criteria."

Here's the link:

http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/...

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,096
Posts
943
Votes
Jennifer T.
  • Investor
  • New Orleans, LA
943
Votes |
1,096
Posts
Jennifer T.
  • Investor
  • New Orleans, LA
Replied

I don't have properties in that area.  But, IMO, the only two issues I have with the ordinance are 1) not being able to select the best tenant and 2) unemployment as a form of income.

Unemployment as a form of income is RIDICULOUS.  In most areas UE is 6 months, at the longest.  And that is 6 months if they are applying for an apartment right at the beginning of their UE.  What if there is only 1 month left anyway?  Come on. 

Do you know who also has to follow anti-discrimination laws?  Companies, for hiring and promotions.  Is there also a law in Seattle that companies need to hire the FIRST candidate with all of their requirements, instead of looking for the best qualified candidate?  I'm guessing the answer is a giant no.  So why would that same idea be different for LLs?  It shouldn't.  Also completely ridiculous.

  • Jennifer T.
  • Loading replies...