Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

188
Posts
53
Votes
Tim Porsche
  • Investor
  • Denver, PA
53
Votes |
188
Posts

Second Tenant Taking Over Lease - Security Deposit Question

Tim Porsche
  • Investor
  • Denver, PA
Posted

Hi All,

I purchased a duplex back in October of last year and the upstairs unit was already rented when I bought it, so I let the tenant stay and they have been very good so far. I received the tenant's $500 security deposit from the seller at closing. About a month ago someone else moved into the unit with the tenant and I had them fill out an application and then approved them and had them both sign a new lease together. Now I've been informed that the original tenant is going to be moving in September and the second tenant wants to take over the lease. I am fine with this, but my question is, how should I handle the $500 security deposit? 

Normally when a tenant moves out, you do a walk through, see what needs repaired, get everything fixed up, and the costs to fix whatever was damage caused by the tenant vs regular wear and tear you would deduct from the security deposit. Should I still do this even though it is still actively being rented by the second tenant? Also, I assume I should have the second tenant sign a new lease after the current tenant moves out and require a security deposit correct? Any advice is appreciated, thanks in advance!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,771
Posts
1,233
Votes
Al Williamson
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Sacramento, CA
1,233
Votes |
2,771
Posts
Al Williamson
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Sacramento, CA
Replied

@Tim Porsche you've got an interesting question. Yes, you want to separate these two renters. 

You want to close out the renter who is moving out. Do a walk through after they clean up the place. They refund his deposit appropriately.

Get a separate deposit and lease from the tenant that wants to stay. Even if you need to put them on a payment plan for the deposit, collect a separate full deposit from them.

I have no problem with a payment plan for the deposit in this situation. But in the new lease, I would add a condition that the deposit payment must be paid before the rent is applied. That way, if you had to evict, you could do so on the basis of "unpaid rent" not failure to pay the deposit.

Loading replies...