Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

52
Posts
18
Votes
Rodney Smith
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Bend, OR
18
Votes |
52
Posts

Bread n Butter type of Property Mix

Rodney Smith
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Bend, OR
Posted

Hey all,

I'm curious to get some feedback from others, but from previous experience / talking with other investors it seems to me that 2/1 unit property mixes seem to be the bread-n-butter type of properties for rental income (assuming that i'm pursuing simple rental agreements using a property management company to manage the units .. i.e. not going after specific niche markets like student housing, etc.). There are a few reasons that standout to me for why this might be:

1) It seems that the extra rent collected by having a 3rd (and especially 4th) bedroom doesn't always proportionally add to the rent price relative to maybe a stereotypical price hike in buying a 3/2 vs a 2/1 (i.e. maybe a 2/1 rents for $750 and a 3/1 gets $900. Only $150 for a 3rd room.

2) I think that there is a large market of people looking to not pay more than absolutely necessary in rent, thus a 2/1 (although marginally cheaper) is cheaper than renting a bigger house, and better fits the budget for a larger demographic. I would wager this dynamic will probably grow in strength / validity over time as the economic outlook of things is (in my fallible opinion) probably more dovish than hawkish. If thats true then that makes these properties pretty marketable.

I'm sure there are a lot of variables at work in this thought process, but I'm curious to hear other peoples thoughts on this - Especially with regards to the Kansas City Missouri market which is one of my primary markets where i'm building my portfolio. It could very well be that i'm mistaken in this thought process as well, which is why i'm interested to hear other people's thoughts on this.

Thanks!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

13,926
Posts
12,727
Votes
Replied

I do not know your area but it is reasonable to assume that the majority of renters makes up the group of single, young couples or young families (1 child). This would be the largest demographic

group of renters making the 2/1 the most desirable units. This also translates into being easier to find qualified applicants

The 3/1 would be more attractive to older families which also means life long renters that are in my opinion a less desirable demographic and less caring in regards to your property. 

Loading replies...