Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 16 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

221
Posts
9
Votes
Mark Hu
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Huntington Beach, CA
9
Votes |
221
Posts

Who is correct, lawbook or cop?

Mark Hu
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Huntington Beach, CA
Posted

I recently read a landlord law book which stressed, although landlord should stay out of domestic/roommates disputes, that if a tenant's life or health was in serious danger from violent/spouse or roommate, landlord might be liable if they do nothing.

The book recommended landlords learn how to get a restraining order so they can advise a potential victim to get such an order how to do it.

But a cop at a local police station told me that was a bunch of baloney and my best bet was to keep entirely out of such situations, and not even give advice.

Who is correct here?

Loading replies...