Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

25
Posts
1
Votes
Kevin R.
  • Philadelphia, PA
1
Votes |
25
Posts

Is it a terrible idea to NOT split gas?

Kevin R.
  • Philadelphia, PA
Posted

In my neck of the woods, multifamily landlords generally pay for water and pass on electric and gas to their tenants. The triplex I have under contract technically has separate gas and electric meters for each unit, but in reality, gas is not split since the home is heated by a single steam boiler. Zoning each unit separately for heat would cost anywhere from $15-30K depending on which approach is taken.

I keep reading about how it's important with MFHs to sub-meter all utilities except water, but I'm having trouble justifying paying all that money when I can simply split the gas bill evenly between the three units (or use a method based on square footage or number of occupants). I would be sure to (a) make sure prospective tenants are aware of how I will split utilities, (b) put appropriate language into the lease to cover my butt, and (c) send out a copy of the gas bill every month to my tenants to be as transparent as possible. Am I overlooking something here?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

139
Posts
231
Votes
Ethan Giller
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
231
Votes |
139
Posts
Ethan Giller
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Philadelphia, PA
Replied

I agree with @Thomas S., you are not buying it cheaply enough to justify the added expense of changing out the heating system no matter which approach you take.  Especially for your first deal.  Just use your contingency period to provide an AOS addendum with a take-it-or-leave-it $20K discount, less additional discounts for the rest of the items that came up in the inspection, and walk away otherwise.  That's assuming you are still comfortable with your contract price after all repairs, which you might realize is too high after all the feedback on this forum.

If you did leave the heating as-is then the entire house will be on one thermostat which you could control either as an owner-occupant or with the thermostat locked in a cage.  But you will then get tenants either complaining that the property isn't being heated enough, or else complaining that the pass-through gas bill is too high because you were keeping the temperature up to high - it's a total lose-lose.

$15K-$30K is definitely what I would expect to pay for 3x new gas forced air units installed with permits, with all duct work and soffits (framing, drywall, painting).  You can't just easily add 2x new boilers to the existing system because you would need to change how all the radiator piping is run (i.e. cutting open walls, replacing piping, drywall, paint).

Loading replies...