Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

2
Posts
0
Votes
Rick Sollman
  • Beverly Hills, CA
0
Votes |
2
Posts

No rental agreement, far out property, afraid to lose tenant

Rick Sollman
  • Beverly Hills, CA
Posted

We have a rental property located a good 40 minutes from us, out in the sticks. Our tenant has been with us for many years, but has managed to miss well over a year's worth of rent payments over time, and is yet again late. It has been years since a rental agreement has been signed so it has reverted to a month-to-month. The resident has invested a very large amount of their personal money into property improvements, without any agreement on compensation. They very likely did not obtain permits.

Because of the property's location, we know that as soon as the property is vacated, it will be vandalized. We would like to sell the property, because we do not feel like the tenant will be consistent with payments moving forward, and we could use the equity. Obtaining another tenant is not very likely, as the demand is very low in that area.  Evicting the current tenant poses the difficulty of them even possibly destroying the improvements. The current tenant would be unable to purchase the property given their financial situation.

This is a messy situation that I've inherited, and I'm having trouble finding a safe path that hopefully leads to the sale of the property, or, worst case, getting the tenant to consistently pay. Advice would be greatly appreciated.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

5,544
Posts
2,364
Votes
Jeff B.
  • Buy & Hold Owner
  • Redlands, CA
2,364
Votes |
5,544
Posts
Jeff B.
  • Buy & Hold Owner
  • Redlands, CA
Replied

strictly non-legal opinion follows:

This certainly is a Sticky-Wicket - - the improvements have created Sweat Equity, unless your lease specifically forbids improvements/modifications w/o written consent.

You need the services of a lawyer to unwind all this and to get the "occupant" extricated.

Get this done before accepting an offer.  Eviction noted above would IMO be a For Cause action, while waiting for an offer with 'to be delivered at coe vacant' might create liability for Relocation Expense.

You need the services of a lawyer

Loading replies...