Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

2
Posts
0
Votes
Mary D.
  • Investor
  • Corona, CA
0
Votes |
2
Posts

pets policy/but pet damages in Cali

Mary D.
  • Investor
  • Corona, CA
Posted

I own a small multi units project. I have a no pets policy. However, many of my tenants end up bringing pets. I start eviction process because of a breach of contract between us. They leave and now I have pet damages. What can I do about this and how do I collect for my damages in the state of California.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

52
Posts
35
Votes
Katrina Edwards
  • Commercial Real Estate Broker
  • Palo Alto, CA
35
Votes |
52
Posts
Katrina Edwards
  • Commercial Real Estate Broker
  • Palo Alto, CA
Replied

One should be very careful about deposits and pet rent in California. 

Here's what I do:

Never make a deposit non-refundable - not legal in CA.

Call ALL deposits "security deposit".  This gives the property owner the greatest flexibility on deductions for damages or other monies owed.

Don't charge "pet rent" in your rental agreement for approved/authorized pets.  There is some controversy on whether or not "pet rent" assumes a higher level of wear and tear.  I don't go there.  Up the rent if you're going to accept pets and if you rent to someone without pets, then call it a win.

I do charge "pet rent" for unauthorized pets.  It's $25/pet per day.  That's $750 per month.  For an additional $750 per month, I'm usually OK with a non-authorized pet, but what this really does is put a monetary cost on them for breaking the rules.  Is it enforcable?  I've charged and collected it.  Never had it contested in court, but  a tenant's rights legal group has their attorneys reviewed my lease documents and addenda during a negotiation and said NOTHING about the unauthorized pets or unauthorized people rent of $25/day/person/pet.  They did take issue with the late fee amount but we explained our costs and it stayed in. Net result was NO CHANGES to our lease/addenda and we signed the folks for a year. 

I've also had a situation where the property owner agreed to allow a resident to keep a cat but ONLY if she agreed to pay for carpet replacement at the end of the lease term.  We collected that replacement cost for the carpet when we did an addendum to add the cat as approved and documented the agreement.

Maybe stronger language in your lease regarding the consequences of having an unauthorized pet on the premises will be a good deterrent.  I make sure to carefully explain the consequences to the residents who lease "no pet" properties.  Sometimes we send a bill for the additional rent for unauthorized pets and negotiate it down.  What we are usually seeking is compliance, not the additional rent. 

I hope this is helpful.

Loading replies...