Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

74
Posts
11
Votes
James Maher
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Campobello, SC
11
Votes |
74
Posts

Actual Cash Value vs Replacement Value Insurance

James Maher
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Campobello, SC
Posted

Are there any kind of formulas typically used when determining if you want your landlord policy to cover replacement cost vs actual cash value?

I am looking at 6 properties right now.  On some of them, my purchase price is significantly lower than the actual cash value.  Also, the cash value on some of them is much lower than what it would cost to replace.  I'm just trying to get a general feel of what most people do.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

397
Posts
244
Votes
Derek Lacy
  • Insurance Agent
  • Maitland, FL
244
Votes |
397
Posts
Derek Lacy
  • Insurance Agent
  • Maitland, FL
Replied

The problem with this question is it's a risk tolerance question.  There is no right answer.  

Here are the facts.  If you choose replacement cost you will absolutely pay more for coverage.  If you choose replacement cost and IF there is a claim, you will pay less out of pocket.  Now reverse and repeat for Actual Cash Value (less for coverage, paid more out of pocket IF a claim occurs).

So now we're to the proverbial glass and is it half full or half empty.  By nature an investors will weigh more to half full, why?  Because if they didn't have that optimism, they would probably be still on the sidelines.

So it comes down to how well will you sleep knowing you are potentially out of pocket a large sum on a $250,000 house (replacement cost, or to put it more easily a mid-century ranch in middle america that has 2200 square feet).

@Larry Turowski hit the nail on the head.  So you get that bad call, there was a fire, not bad, but not good.  The property manager says the fire was contained to the kitchen and the contractor says they can repair it for $60,000.

What did that contractor just tell you?  Replacement cost.

What is Actual Cash Value?  Replacement cost minus depreciation.

So now the adjuster comes out and he uses the standard depreciation (I see it all of the time at 40%, they use complex calcs, but it basically always shakes down to a stones throw of 40%).

Now the adjuster is telling you the check he will write on the $60,000 in damages is $35,000 (assuming a $1,000 deductible).  Can you afford the $25,000?  Can you sell the house as-is and break even?  Can you tear it down, walk away and get another house with the $35,000?  

It's risk tolerance, so if you purchase stocks, are you a guy that picks a company and buys into it, or do you buy a mutual fund?  What's the right answer?

Loading replies...