Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 9 years ago,

User Stats

24
Posts
1
Votes
Sherief Melik
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Rolling Meadows, IL
1
Votes |
24
Posts

Vacant Rate question (Aurora, Joliet and Cicero)

Sherief Melik
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Rolling Meadows, IL
Posted

Hi All,

I live in Chicago, and was looking for cities around me with low crime rate to start rental investment, also i am looking for the highest ROI.

I like so far Cicero , Aurora and Joliet and open to any other suggestions, what drove me crazy that i did test posting an ad for Aurora 2 bedroom for $750 on craigslist and i did not get ANY single mail asking me anything in the last 24 hours.

Does that mean vacant rate is high in Aurora, IL or what ? or am i posting wrong way.

Please share your experience with new investor ! :)

Thanks

Loading replies...