Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1,888
Posts
1,045
Votes
Jack B.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Seattle, WA
1,045
Votes |
1,888
Posts

Freedom Mentor Phil P. philosophy on quantity of rentals?

Jack B.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Seattle, WA
Posted

Watching a video of Phil P. of freedommentor.com, I was surprised to hear him say that he too used to think it was better to have 24 properties all highly leveraged instead of one or two paid off properties that cash flowed well, and that he knows better now.

The only thing that immediately comes to mind as a good point about this is that the more properties you have, the more expenses you also have when it comes time to renovate, and if your goal is just FI, you can get that typically with one or two paid off rental homes and call it good, while living a simple existence with little hassle.

But maybe there are other reasons for this, or is he wrong?

Loading replies...