Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago,

User Stats

24
Posts
2
Votes
VAL A.
  • Homeowner
  • San Diego, CA
2
Votes |
24
Posts

Is lease clause legal? Tenant questioning it.

VAL A.
  • Homeowner
  • San Diego, CA
Posted

I own homes in another state.   I've leased them out for a number of years and always had the lessee responsible for full maintenance of the property as if they were the homeowner.   The exception to that is I've paid if the repair was what I considered "major"...ie broken water line underground, roof problems of any sort.   Lease reads:  Lessee will, at its sole expense, keep and maintain the Premises and appurtenances in good condition and repair during the term of this agreement.    

Current Tenant is stating that this clause is illegal in the state of New Mexico.   I have always charged less than market rent to tenants which I felt was a fair balance.   Tenant contacted me in early May re a/c issue--stopped.   I sent a/c co out...thorough check of system--$150 charge to me--unit frozen as apparently tenant keeping unit on and set at 68.     Tenant contacted me again late May--I sent out a/c co again--same issue--a/c co advises customer AGAIN can't run the unit like they are doing---tenant says he can set it at whatever temp he wants!     Now tenant again contacted me...a/c has stopped.   I referred him to his lease.  I had paid the prior $300 "in good faith".    

I feel my lease is completely legal---  Comments or thoughts or references to help please?

Loading replies...