Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

24
Posts
2
Votes
VAL A.
  • Homeowner
  • San Diego, CA
2
Votes |
24
Posts

Is lease clause legal? Tenant questioning it.

VAL A.
  • Homeowner
  • San Diego, CA
Posted

I own homes in another state.   I've leased them out for a number of years and always had the lessee responsible for full maintenance of the property as if they were the homeowner.   The exception to that is I've paid if the repair was what I considered "major"...ie broken water line underground, roof problems of any sort.   Lease reads:  Lessee will, at its sole expense, keep and maintain the Premises and appurtenances in good condition and repair during the term of this agreement.    

Current Tenant is stating that this clause is illegal in the state of New Mexico.   I have always charged less than market rent to tenants which I felt was a fair balance.   Tenant contacted me in early May re a/c issue--stopped.   I sent a/c co out...thorough check of system--$150 charge to me--unit frozen as apparently tenant keeping unit on and set at 68.     Tenant contacted me again late May--I sent out a/c co again--same issue--a/c co advises customer AGAIN can't run the unit like they are doing---tenant says he can set it at whatever temp he wants!     Now tenant again contacted me...a/c has stopped.   I referred him to his lease.  I had paid the prior $300 "in good faith".    

I feel my lease is completely legal---  Comments or thoughts or references to help please?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

10,171
Posts
4,921
Votes
Andrew Syrios
  • Residential Real Estate Investor
  • Kansas City, MO
4,921
Votes |
10,171
Posts
Andrew Syrios
  • Residential Real Estate Investor
  • Kansas City, MO
ModeratorReplied

I've heard of arrangements like this, but I can't say whether it's legal. I think you've really got to call an attorney to figure this out for sure. That being said, these types of arrangements don't seem to work out well in my experience. Tenants just usually aren't that good at general maintenance and usually do more harm than good in the long term. At least that's my experience.

Loading replies...