Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

17
Posts
1
Votes
Pete Peterson
  • Renter
  • Pacific Palisades, CA
1
Votes |
17
Posts

VRBO rental questions (Los Angeles county)

Pete Peterson
  • Renter
  • Pacific Palisades, CA
Posted

I want to rent my entire furnished home (Pacific Palisades primary residence) as a summer vacation rental in 2016. I'm trying to decide if I will aim to rent for 30 days of less or not.

The thing that really concerns me are these Liberal eviction laws that favor guests. What is the procedure if they refuse to leave? Do I have to go through that whole 3 - 6 month unlawful detainer legal process? Or can I just call the Sheriff? I read on the Internet what I thought said that when someone stays for 30 days or less, and their occupancy is subject to the state’s hotel occupancy tax then they are a “guest” and have no "tenant" rights. True? I read NOLO's California Landlording book and there was NO mention about short-term rentals. Waste of $30 for that book.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

55
Posts
11
Votes
Jayden Hakunti
  • Investor
  • San Ramon, CA
11
Votes |
55
Posts
Jayden Hakunti
  • Investor
  • San Ramon, CA
Replied
Originally posted by @Pete Peterson:

If true then I think this notion that "if someone stays for more than 30 days then they have squatter rights" is a myth.

 In order to pursue adverse possession in California, one must have pay the tax note for the property for at least 5 years, and have open and notorious possesion of the property. THen to file quite title action in superior court. Meaning you have the property in your possession and it's known to others that you have it. Easy way to avoid this for the property owner is to have taxes paid up-to-date and checkup on vacant properties. If the owner never gave one permission to occupy premises and has taxes up-to-date then that would just be simple trespassing. Unless somehow the trespasser got keys to the property then it would be hard to prove trespassing. 

Loading replies...