Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago,

User Stats

14
Posts
4
Votes
James M.
  • Investor
  • Fredericksburg, VA
4
Votes |
14
Posts

Security Deposit and Torn Carpet

James M.
  • Investor
  • Fredericksburg, VA
Posted

What can I take out of a security deposit for dog-destroyed carpet that is 10-years old?

Tenants moved out after 4 years. On top of the normal security deposit, my tenant paid a $400 damage deposit to have a pet. The dog tore through some carpet in three rooms. The three rooms require replacement.

The carpet being replaced is over ten years old (6 years while I was there and 4 years with tenant). I would not have had to replace it if the dog had not destroyed it. I understand that depreciation of the carpet means that it has no value left and I cannot charge the tenant for the damage. 

However, this does not seem "fair" that a a tenant can destroy 400 sq ft. of carpet and walk away scot-free. Can I charge to have the carpet in those rooms replace simply because the excessive damage is the only reason I have to change the carpet?

Thanks for any counsel you can give.

Loading replies...