Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago,

User Stats

98
Posts
48
Votes
Alma Mills
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
48
Votes |
98
Posts

Should I still require 3x rent for a property that is $5000+ a month?

Alma Mills
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

We have a beautiful 5 bedroom 3 bath that we are going to be renting for $5500 a month and are considering lowering the income requirement.  Normally we usually require income of 3x the rent or at the least rents being 40% of the income.  Our thought process is that a family should be able to easily live on much less than $11,000 a month after housing is paid for.  

We are in Los Angeles 2 block from Culver City if you were wondering.  

What are you thoughts? anyone tried doing the same and found it worked or discovered problems?

Loading replies...