Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago,

Account Closed
  • Homeowner
  • Signal Hill, CA
70
Votes |
521
Posts

Experian CONNECT

Account Closed
  • Homeowner
  • Signal Hill, CA
Posted

http://www.experian.com/connect/renters-share-your...

yea its very pro-tenant being marketed for tenants not landlords afterall. i heard experian also offers landlords 'free' credit checks on their tenants, but that is not the 'connect' plan and i wonder if that one's really free?

the connect program seems pretty straight forward and costs prospective tenants 15 bucks and they can apply it to multiple properties they're applying to.

would it be legal to require all tenants to provide their Experian Connect self-initiated credit check?

would it be legal to thus not charge a fee for this kind of credit check, thus not ever have to be held liable for returning any fees, nor deal with potential returned-check fees just for applicant credit checks?