Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 15 years ago,

User Stats

45
Posts
5
Votes
David Albertson
  • Eudora, KS
5
Votes |
45
Posts

Low income rental screening question.

David Albertson
  • Eudora, KS
Posted

I have a SFR in a low income area. I just received an application (with application fee) from a single mother. The local screening service I use didn't come up with any criminal history, but did come up with one rental judgement from 2001 and one medical judgement from 2002 that has been paid. She also has about $8400 worth of unpaid medical bills that have been placed for collection.

My question is, if I call to verify employment, is it leagal to ask how much her monthly income is? Also, if I were to do a month to month lease and she didn't pay, would I still have to go thru the eviction process to get her out?

Loading replies...