Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

15
Posts
3
Votes
Ryan Chorbagian
  • Investor
  • Chicago, IL
3
Votes |
15
Posts

Inherited Tenants and Chicago Security Deposit

Ryan Chorbagian
  • Investor
  • Chicago, IL
Posted

Hello everyone.  

I'm closing on my first investment property in two weeks.  Thanks for all the help leading up to this.  

Question:  I'm inheriting tenants in one of the units of the building.  The seller has offered to transfer the security deposits to me. After researching and reading a ton of info about the difficulty landlords in Chicago have re: deposits, I'm hesitant to accept it.  Im considering returning the deposit to the tenant and hoping for the best, as I don't feel comfortable asking for a "move-in fee" from someone who is obviously already moved in. I cant find any definitive answer as to whether or not the security deposit interest rule applies to owner occupied 2-4 flat properties (like the one I'm buying).  I've heard it both ways and I'd like to be able to hold on to the deposit, but its not worth it to me if I will have legal issues down the line. Is anyone for sure for sure?  

Thanks very much for reading.  

P.S. Info from this website is the reason I am closing on this property.  Im super grateful.  

Loading replies...