Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 10 years ago, 11/21/2014

User Stats

10
Posts
1
Votes
Muki Naseer
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Raleigh, NC
1
Votes |
10
Posts

How do I choose tenants if there are multiple, very good pre-screened candidates?

Muki Naseer
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Raleigh, NC
Posted

I have at least 4 couples who (at least in pre-screening) score almost identically high. I have not yet asked them to apply, and therefore I haven't collected any application fee from them. I don't want ALL of them to unneccessarily pay the application fee and have their background/credit run if i'm only going to pick 1. Should I go with the background check on the first couple and do the due diligence on the references etc. and then move on to the next, and so on and so forth?

How do most of you handle this "good problem" ?

Loading replies...