Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

96
Posts
33
Votes
Paul C.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Henderson, NV
33
Votes |
96
Posts

Optimal number of Single Family rentals?

Paul C.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Henderson, NV
Posted

Anyone have an opinion on what the optimal number of single famly rentals to have is?

Let's say the goal is to achieve unlevered returns on capital of 7%, but be relatively hands off via a good property manager.  The ideal extent of involvement would be a few hours of bookkeeping each month and fielding the occasional question from a property manager on how something should be handled.

Clearly, 1 or 2 homes would be too few and not allow you to smooth out cash flow over time.  But is there a point where it becomes too many?

If you had unlimited capital, how many would you ideally want to have before focusing your investment efforts elsewhere?

Loading replies...