Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 11 years ago,

User Stats

216
Posts
167
Votes
Jason C.
  • Investor
  • Austin, TX
167
Votes |
216
Posts

This is a good problem to have

Jason C.
  • Investor
  • Austin, TX
Posted

Hello BP community!

I have a rental property that I just put on the market last Wednesday, and received some promising phone inquiries. I decided to schedule all of them to view the property yesterday afternoon, and I ended up getting three really good applications. I have not fully screened them yet, but these three are looking great on paper. So, in choosing my tenant, do I have to go with the applicant who showed up at the house first, or can I pick a different one that I have a better gut feeling about? Also, what is the verbiage I should use to let the other two know they did not get the house?

Loading replies...