Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 7 months ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

11
Posts
30
Votes
Jordan M.
  • Investor
  • Covington, LA
30
Votes |
11
Posts

New MHP - Previous owner did not require deposits

Jordan M.
  • Investor
  • Covington, LA
Posted

Hi everyone. I just closed on a 23 unit mobile home park, almost all lot rentals. The previous owner did not require deposits. I'm trying to decide if I should require all tenants to provide a deposit equal to one month lot rent. I'm already giving them increase letters ($45 increase) on July 1st, effective August 1st. What I don't want is some mass exodus from the park as a result of rent increases and deposits. Keep in mind, this is very low income housing. I would give them 30-60 days to come up with the deposit. Thoughts?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,086
Posts
735
Votes
Ray Hage
  • Investor
  • Fort Lauderdale, FL
735
Votes |
1,086
Posts
Ray Hage
  • Investor
  • Fort Lauderdale, FL
Replied

It's a bit of a tough position especially if they have been living there for a long time with the previous owner without having a security deposit. I suppose it depends. If your goal is to keep all the current tenants, it might be wise to avoid it. If the $45 rent increase + security is tough for the them, maybe you can go a little higher with the rent increase and not ask for the security. Either way, it is tough. 

I'd probably lean towards just increasing the rent a bit more than you originally planned and only for new tenants, require a deposit. That way you don't have to immediately worry about a big loss in cash flow starting in Aug.

Loading replies...