Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 8 months ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

11
Posts
30
Votes
Jordan M.
  • Investor
  • Covington, LA
30
Votes |
11
Posts

New MHP - Previous owner did not require deposits

Jordan M.
  • Investor
  • Covington, LA
Posted

Hi everyone. I just closed on a 23 unit mobile home park, almost all lot rentals. The previous owner did not require deposits. I'm trying to decide if I should require all tenants to provide a deposit equal to one month lot rent. I'm already giving them increase letters ($45 increase) on July 1st, effective August 1st. What I don't want is some mass exodus from the park as a result of rent increases and deposits. Keep in mind, this is very low income housing. I would give them 30-60 days to come up with the deposit. Thoughts?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,098
Posts
746
Votes
Ray Hage
  • Investor
  • Fort Lauderdale, FL
746
Votes |
1,098
Posts
Ray Hage
  • Investor
  • Fort Lauderdale, FL
Replied

It's a bit of a tough position especially if they have been living there for a long time with the previous owner without having a security deposit. I suppose it depends. If your goal is to keep all the current tenants, it might be wise to avoid it. If the $45 rent increase + security is tough for the them, maybe you can go a little higher with the rent increase and not ask for the security. Either way, it is tough. 

I'd probably lean towards just increasing the rent a bit more than you originally planned and only for new tenants, require a deposit. That way you don't have to immediately worry about a big loss in cash flow starting in Aug.

Loading replies...