Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 11 years ago,

User Stats

224
Posts
64
Votes
Pam R.
  • Investor
  • Delaware, OH
64
Votes |
224
Posts

Ohio Supreme Court Ruling on Tenant-Landlord Law

Pam R.
  • Investor
  • Delaware, OH
Posted

Read this in the paper today, and thought Ohio landlords would be interested. In a nutshell, a guest left a tenant's apartment, went down the common area stairs, where ALL the lights were burned out, tripped on the bottom stair, and crashed through a plate glass window. The article in the paper mentioned the doctors said she will never get rid of the scars on her arms and face. She was 16 when it happened.

The first court granted a summary judgement to the Landlord. To paraphrase - since the guest was a guest and not a tenant, the landlord's statutory obligations did not extend to her.

The Ohio Supreme Court disagreed, saying that the statuary obligations to the tenant extend to the guests as well. (again paraphrasing) They didn't find the landlord liable, but she can now file suit again.

I was a little surprised...not by the Supreme Court decision (that seems commonsense to me - safety measures apply to everybody) - but that the initial court actually issued a summary judgement - the guest didn't even qualify to bring suit. Interesting.

http://www.courtnewsohio.gov/cases/2014/SCO/0212/121600.asp#.Uv19zvldUfU