Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 1 year ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

23
Posts
8
Votes
Peter Sik
8
Votes |
23
Posts

Security deposit disposition sent. Due date needed???

Peter Sik
Posted

PM sent Security deposit disposition without mentioning the "pay by date" to the previous tenant. Saying the following:

"Regarding the security deposit disposition on xxxxxx .Although not mentioned specifically, the amount due is due immediately. The courts when challenged here will allow 30-days upon receipt to make payment or agree to payment arrangements. Along with the Disposition Letter, the previous tenant also receives invoices that relate to the balance due. Since this is a large balance due, filing with a collection agency should be a good option."

It doesn't right to me with no due date mentioned. Is this PM not doing right or it just like this in Alabama? In CA, i would just put a DUE DATE for everything. Thanks

Loading replies...