Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

618
Posts
351
Votes
Robert Steele
  • Investor
  • Lucas, TX
351
Votes |
618
Posts

Gross income 3x rent too simplistic

Robert Steele
  • Investor
  • Lucas, TX
Posted

I see this metric of gross income should be 3x or 4x rent and cannot see how this can possibly be useful other than a preliminary "should I even bother looking at this app".

I think a more useful metric would be to use net income which you can calculate by looking at their credit report. That said would the multiplier still be 3x, 4x rent or 2x? I haven't seen anyone address this issue although one commenter on another thread did bring it up. To the sound of crickets.

I have an applicant who has $10K/month income but is $5K/month in debt payments. The rent is $1500. So they meet the 3x, 4x gross and even meet 3x net. Their credit score is in the 500's and they getting divorced. I am wondering if this is where the debt to income metric comes in. Does anyone use that metric and if so what value do you find acceptable?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

718
Posts
912
Votes
John Chapman
  • Investor
  • Dallas, TX
912
Votes |
718
Posts
John Chapman
  • Investor
  • Dallas, TX
Replied

I agree that net income is a much more precise (and thus better) metric for measuring the tenant's ability to pay. The thing is, though, I'm not sure it really matters.

I think at the end of the day most tenants have a basic understanding that when push comes to shove, and they've got to decide which creditors to pay, they are going to pay the landlord first so they don't end up homeless. I think there are very few bills that can you stop paying that will have as serious ramifications as failing to pay rent. You can stop paying your credit card, and all the credit card company can do is sic collections on you and get a judgment. You can stop paying your car loan, and the dealer can take the car back. In Texas, if you stop paying the rent, you are thrown out by the constable in a matter of weeks. Child support is the only bill that I can think of that can have pretty serious ramifications (jailtime) if you don't pay.

With that perspective, I think that 3x's the rent generally works. If a tenant makes that much, the tenant can probably afford the basics of life (food, utilities, etc.) and still pay the rent. If the tenant gets in too deep with other creditors, they will simply stop paying those other creditors, not the landlord.

Loading replies...